View Single Post
Old
11-26-2012, 03:17 PM
  #1010
SackTastic
Embrace The Suck
 
SackTastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 5,114
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pondslider View Post
I don't know if Jackson is better because I haven't seen him play in this system. I think just looking at their stats they're very similar. I think Fitzpatrick has difficulty making routine throws and that another QB without Fitzpatrick's mechanical issues might have more success making those throws. More of those completions, leads to longer drives, leads to more points. At least in theory. Maybe Jackson wouldn't be successful here, but I think it's insane to do the same thing over and over and expect something new to happen and I don't see the harm in trying something new.
Jackson's mechanics aren't great either. He was never very good in Minnesota, and the few games I saw him play in Seattle didn't impress either.

Fitz has proven he CAN be successful in this system; the knock is inconsistency. In general, I don't like change for the sake of change either. Put the guy in that gives you the best chance to win, even if that winning blows up your draft position.

SackTastic is offline