View Single Post
11-26-2012, 08:55 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Country: Czech_ Republic
Posts: 21,468
vCash: 500
This thread has turned quite painful the last few pages. Vlasic has managed to be a Top 4 D without any sort of shot or physicality. Tanev is probably 10x as smart, so I'm sure he can also carve out a career. What made Nicklas Lidstrom special sure as hell wasn't his shot or his strength. This is such a simplistic argument, I can't believe anyone is actually wasting their time arguing with you for so long.

As for his play with the Wolves, he's on pace for 115 shots on target over 82 games and he's shooting at about 5% which is pretty average for a defenseman. And I still don't know what that has to do with his ability to step up to play as Top 4 D.

Tiranis is offline