Thread: Speculation: Luongo thread continued...
View Single Post
Old
11-26-2012, 08:02 PM
  #115
Liferleafer
Bring on Stome-afin!
 
Liferleafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 13,088
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bleach Clean View Post
How do you differentiate the price of the two? If you want your logic to be unassailable, you have to do the following:


- List cases that show the depreciation of the same asset given a 6 year gap.


- Equate that case or cases to Luongo by illustrating the calibre of the asset in a comparison to Lu.


- Either the contract is excellent or poor in your evaluation. If it is poor, you are wrong. If it is excellent, then his term shouldn't matter in the same vein that term is exploited in cap-circumvention deals. Something the league is trying to shut the door on.


- Show comparable players at all. Who's value compares to Lu and why?



After doing that, then we have a basis for discussion. If you don't do it, then you are perpetuating the misinformation that many have already adopted. Yes, you have been the most amiable to deal with among the TO fans on this board (IMO), but it's all for naught if you continue to think the same way.
Bleach....it isn't black and white when it comes to value. It is what a team can afford to pay. The Leafs do not have the depth to pay what Gillis wants. When i say the price is to high, i mean specifically for TO.

Liferleafer is offline