View Single Post
11-27-2012, 04:59 PM
Registered User
kthsn's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,726
vCash: 1785
Originally Posted by ACC1224 View Post
If you removed their current #2 he could fill the role is the point.
Sorry for missing that. I think that's incredibly true but for the most part teams have a franchise C, not just a #1C ahead of their #2.

As someone without an emotional attachment but still a viewer, Grabovski should really be the least of TO's worries.

100% hustle, weak but not by any means "soft" and some nice dangles. Add in he's really the only C who's capable at both ends of the rink.

kthsn is offline   Reply With Quote