View Single Post
11-27-2012, 09:08 PM
Registered User
Firefoxx's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 658
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Jack de la Hoya View Post
But you don't think Winnipeg loses this deal, right?
I think it's relatively even on value tbh. But for a franchise player it shouldn't be just equal value, it should be equal + something significant since the team wouldn't be trading them just to trade them. They would need that extra incentive to make the move. It's sort of like why would Winnipeg trade Kane for fair value when their are plenty happy with him? They would need a deal that blows them away. At least thats how I look at it and how I think they intended for it to be in the rules.

Firefoxx is offline   Reply With Quote