Thread: Proposal: Sj - edm
View Single Post
Old
11-28-2012, 10:01 PM
  #46
Arrch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NorCal
Country: United States
Posts: 4,483
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by glenbuis View Post
I think its because of the contending team idea. The sharks for the past decade were always thought of to be a legit contender. The past coupla years it just seems like to me that there sliding farther away from the cup then getting closer. So they cant trade Boyle, Marleau or Thornton because of the no movement clauses. No sense talking about it then. If they never had those clauses those three could fetch 4-6 good prospects and 3 or so good young players to compliment couture, pavelski, burns etc. If they wait 2-3 yrs , the value of those players will drop quickly.
Not that I think trading them is the answer, but Boyle's NTC is limited.

Arrch is online now   Reply With Quote