Thread: KHL in 5 years?
View Single Post
Old
11-29-2012, 07:39 AM
  #61
kajoo
Registered User
 
kajoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Slovakia
Country: Slovakia
Posts: 802
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by vorky View Post
Seems you dont understand history of Popradīs club. Milan and Zagreb have bigger potential for KHL than Poprad, Kosice, Trencin or so.
agree with Poprad/Trencin, but you are wrong about Kosice. They have better arena than 50% of current KHL clubs, and potential to sell it day in and day out.

Zagrebīs potential is imo limited by far more popular football club Dinamo thatīs eating huge part of sponsorship cake (their annual budget is estimateed to 20m) they also receive huge support of municipality, which is imo leaving less room for Medvescak. Spoke to Medvescak fans who said that no way in hell can Medvescak inflate their budget to 10m annualy without russian money.

Milan has potential to make good living for everyone (lesbian volleyball team, contest in farting, really everyone), thing is, are you sure that Rossoblu will be capable to make the best of Milanīs potential ? So far it looks like noone in Milano cares about hockey, when they cant sell out 4000 arena. OK, maybe hordes of fans are only waiting on KHL to sell out their arena, but so far Rossobluīs average att. is less than 2000.


Quote:
Originally Posted by vorky View Post
never said it. Try to read again
Quote:
Originally Posted by vorky View Post
Yes, Slovan is 5th in conference now, that is great. But look at their PR department, media communication, website etc - it is not KHL level. And yes, KHL does not need such clubs anymore, clubs where is no potential. Therefore no Kosice, Trencin etc.


Last edited by kajoo: 11-29-2012 at 08:00 AM.
kajoo is offline   Reply With Quote