View Single Post
11-29-2012, 01:02 PM
Just a Fool
Rhiessan71's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Guelph, Ont
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,552
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by eva unit zero View Post
Lidstrom scored more at 40 than Bourque did, both absolute and adjusted.

In fact, his adjusted numbers from that year stack up pretty well against many of Bourque's PRIME seasons.

A clearly declined Lidstrom was equivalent or only slightly worse than Bourque offensively. And better defensively.
Oh well, if Adjusted Stats says that a 40 year old Lidstrom is as good offensively as a prime Bourque, it must be true

At this point it's like arguing Brimsek v. Hasek. One was clearly the best in the league over his career span in that he was considered one of the best from start to finish. The other had one of the best primes ever at his position, but was not as strong outside of his prime.
Ummm...Bourque was the one that was clearly considered one of the best in the league from start to finish AND he was the one with one of the best primes ever at his position.
By the time Lidstrom won his first Norris at 31, he had 4 All-star nods. Bourque by 31 had 4 Norris and 12 All-star nods.
Lidstrom would go on to win 6 more Norris and 8 more All-star nods. Bourque won another Norris and had 7 more all-star nods.

19 All-star nods in 22 season to 12 All-star nods in 20 seasons.

Last edited by Rhiessan71: 11-29-2012 at 01:10 PM.
Rhiessan71 is online now   Reply With Quote