View Single Post
Old
11-29-2012, 08:45 PM
  #34
Steve
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Guelph, Ontario, Can
Posts: 1,238
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJDevs26 View Post
Someone said before, this might be a pre-emptive strike by Bettman against the decertification/disclaimer of interest. Reason being, if they aren't willing to negotiate without Fehr in the room, how can they be taken seriously when they want to decertify and aren't having Fehr negotiate for them then?
Excellent point, never thought about that. I assume they would simply argue that if there is no union, collective bargaining is unnecessary and their unwillingness/inability shouldn't be considered.

Steve is offline