View Single Post
11-30-2012, 12:28 AM
Alicat's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: BOSTON
Country: United States
Posts: 22,047
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Deal Law View Post
I have no idea re the payment plans. Gift tax is not actually my thing (corporate tax is), I just happened to be working on a very similar issue today when this story reared its head.

What I failed to realize initially is that gifts made to employees are in fact includible in the employees' gross income for income tax purposes, as an employer is deemed to not give gifts out of "detached and disinterested generosity." So now the whole story makes sense.

Without taking the preceding into account, it wouldn't make sense that employees would have footed any tax bill if the rings were gifted, as it would have fallen on Jacobs to pay the gift tax. However, this clearly falls under the rule above from IRC Section 102(c) and thus the employees do in fact have taxable income equal to the value of the rings.

However, that the employees were forced to foot the tax bill is not a function of Jacobs being a miserable *******, but of U.S. federal tax law. So, in sum, don't jump on Jacobs for this one. Your ire is misplaced.
I'm defending Jacobs here

It sucks but they have something most of us would love to have. Thanks for another awesome post!

"I choose to focus on the things I CAN do and am passionate about." - Sam Berns

I am Boston Strong

Alicat is offline