View Single Post
Old
11-30-2012, 08:16 AM
  #904
Tim Wallach
Registered User
 
Tim Wallach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,678
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeylegend11 View Post
I think a better solution at a lot lower cost is ditch your 2 o/as and add Hottot,Schoenmakers, and Carlos Amestoy,u get 2 20 goal scorers,1 potential 20 scorer in Amestoy,plus Hottot and Schoesmakers gives the Rangers some snarl up front
Would not u would win but be much more competive at a cheap cost in zero cost to the teams future,or at least minimal
A selloff is unneccessary,and going nucluear regards to the ditching of youth
I give u credit for a fertile imagination,Rangers are probably glad that u arent the GM

Dream scenarios aside, I'd actually prefer Even Steven's approach. What you describe legend is exactly what has exasperated a lot of Rangers fans lately. Conservative dabbling and mostly stand-pat approaches at the deadline that perpetuate a cycle of "decent" hockey. Never the top, never the bottom.

In junior hockey, it makes all the sense in the world to be bold. You go all-in or you go all-out and totally rebuild for your next all-in phase. Simply trying to be respectable and competitive is kind of a loser's game if you ask me.

Tim Wallach is offline