Thread: Proposal: Tor-det
View Single Post
Old
11-30-2012, 08:58 AM
  #18
Sundinisagod
King Altelius
 
Sundinisagod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Zagreb
Country: Croatia
Posts: 7,166
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avs44 View Post
Why would Toronto do this??? If they are trading someone as good as Gardiner, it better be for a #1 C or #1G, either in a package or straight up. Why would they trade him for a 3rd line center and a 2014 1st? Helm is a very nice player, but there is no way Toronto would do this. Never mind the value, which for a top young D is bad, but it fills no needs, and sets them back.



Edit: You added Smith. Well now its bad...just in the opposite direction.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy8oooo View Post
So the "or straight up" didn't actually mean 'straight up'? Wow, is right...
I'll go out on a limb and say that"either in a package or straight up" does not mean 'straight up'. It's pretty conveniant to pull whichever words you like out of a sentence and change their context.

First proposal bad for Leafs, 2nd bad for Detroit.

Sundinisagod is offline   Reply With Quote