View Single Post
Old
11-30-2012, 01:03 PM
  #195
LordHelmet
Registered User
 
LordHelmet's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Twin Cities
Country: United States
Posts: 942
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayor Bee View Post
The cap isn't the problem. The rapid acceleration of mandatory payrolls is a big problem, and the inability to offset that is a bigger one. The unwillingness of certain owners (read: "traditional markets") to adopt an NFL-style system of revenue sharing directly relates to that.
The part in bold is spot on.

The way the math works, the floor grows faster than the cap. Correct that calculation, and the teams that are losing money become solvent. Rather than being a fixed dollar amount less than the cap, it should change/increase by the same percentage.

The fact that this has not been a part of any of the owners' proposals tells me that their supposed concern for the small market teams is a sham, and that the real goal of the 'hard line' owners in this lockout (and the next one, and the next one after that..) is to guarantee further increases in profits for large market teams.

LordHelmet is offline   Reply With Quote