View Single Post
11-30-2012, 01:45 PM
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,721
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by cheswick View Post
Its the nature of the system in place in the NHL. Just because a team is not making as much revenue as the Leafs doesn't mean its badly managed. I would say the Leafs not making the playofs for 8 years is badly managed but makes tonnes of revenue. And it certainly makes sense within that system.

The simple fact is, if you want a system where a certian percentage of overall league revnue is paid to the players, then yes you need a mechanism to even the revenues because revenues across teams are not consistent.

Alternatively you could set a cap and floor on an individual team basis and allow the Leafs to spend more than the Islanders and Coyotes. This would likely cause a disparity in quality of teams. You can't have your cake and eat it too
So 3 teams making 83% of the total revenues means that this league is healthy and should continue on the same economic basis ?

The system doesn't work and most players are making at least 50% too much money.

NHL cannot compete against MLB, NFL and NBA. Bettman & cie are dreaming. They don't have the fat TV contract and never will.

If they finally cancel this season overall, thre at least 4 to 6 teams that will fold or be sold before next September.

Habtchum* is offline