Owner-Player meeting only, no Bettman or Fehr (UPD: 12/4 in NYC)
View Single Post
11-30-2012, 02:17 PM
Smartest in the Room
Join Date: Apr 2006
Originally Posted by
So the good adimistrations and successful markets ALWAYS have to pay for the weak and badly managed teams. Does it make sense ?
Let's agree on at least this. The Maple Leafs (sorry to pick on them) are an example of a team that is weak and badly managed and they still make a lot of money. Let's don't pretend that a team is poorly managed simply because it doesn't bring in the same revenue as a team that has little to no competition for their fans' money.
Franchises like Nashville may be struggling to create a fan base in a non-traditional market, but they are an example of an extremely well run organization with great management.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by KINGS17