View Single Post
11-30-2012, 03:40 PM
Registered User
DAChampion's Avatar
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Country: Australia
Posts: 9,738
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by HankyZetts View Post
Anyways, I'm done with these circular arguments with you. Imo you are a prime example of the point DAChampion was making about the double standards being applied here. You talk about 62k as if it's something special, then cry for the few owners of teams losing millions, because they might, one day, only be able to sell their team for a measly $150,000,000. Poor that guy, how is he going to cope with life after hockey?!
I agree. I've diligently and comprehensively refuted his "players take zero risks" over a few posts, and there were expansions and elaborations from a few other posters. He still doesn't get it. For him, when a player takes risks "he's pursuing a dream" so it doesn't count as a risk , but when an owner takes a risk he must be cuddled at all costs. It comes down to political ideology for him. He wants billionaires protected of harm and to live in a no-risk world, but a free-for-all for everybody else.

DAChampion is offline