View Single Post
Old
11-30-2012, 05:20 PM
  #21
Fourier
Registered User
 
Fourier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Waterloo Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,780
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbcwpg View Post
Players on Canadian teams dinged on pension

http://www.calgaryherald.com/sports/...656/story.html

The NHL pension plan is funded and administered jointly by the league and the players’ association. For the first 160 games of a player’s career, he gets $24,000 a season in his pension fund, regardless of where he plays. But things get more complicated after a player has logged the equivalent of two full seasons in the NHL.

The annual payments jump to about $50,000 a year — the actual amount varies depending on exchange rates — but Canadian tax laws cap pension contributions at $24,000. A Canadian player gets $24,000 dumped into his pension account and receives a cheque for the remaining amount — after the tax man takes his cut.

Darche added that the NHLPA is lobbying the federal government for an exemption that would allow more money to be placed into the pension fund.

“The difference is huge,” Darche said. “A player who plays 15 seasons with a U.S. team will have about $1 million in his pension account, while a player with a Canadian team would have $375,000.”
Hockey players are certainly not the only people who are subject to this rule. Why would they deserve an exemption that others would not receive. They are already much more likely to have a secure future than others for whom this rule applies? I can see the arguement that their earning years are limited, but this is about it. Politically, this would be a very dicey move.


Last edited by Fourier: 11-30-2012 at 05:27 PM.
Fourier is offline   Reply With Quote