View Single Post
11-30-2012, 07:32 PM
Registered User
Firefoxx's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 658
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Jack de la Hoya View Post
Quick was an obvious oversight on my part. (I'm sure there are / will be others).

In game terms, you are right about Kopitar vs. Richards, but with three guys at that position over 86, it seems tough to call him untouchable (again, in game terms)
I personally would consider players with franchise potential as "franchise players" too. The players that either already are the face of the franchise or are well on their way.

Examples: Larsson on NJ, Landeskog on Colorado. They may not be clear "franchise" players like Stamkos, but it's clear they will be (in real life).

Edit: Though I agree they are few and far between, and not every team has to have one.

Firefoxx is offline   Reply With Quote