View Single Post
12-02-2012, 12:04 PM
Join Date: Nov 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 16,821
vCash: 500
For the record, I have no problem with holding Jacobs responsible, if as long as "responsible" you mean "responsible for whatever good comes out of the CBA, as well as the bad things happening now."

If the CBA turns out to be good for the sport, like the last one did when Jacobs led that particular charge, and you're willing to give JJ full marks for his role, then I'm on board with bringing up the cost. If you're not prepared to credit JJ if the lockout turns out to have been the right thing in the long run, then hold your peace now.

Dojji* is offline   Reply With Quote