View Single Post
12-02-2012, 11:16 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,362
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by TheJuxtaposer View Post
So we know that not all owners support a lockout at this point, right? Boston and Philly are pro-lockout, and the Sharks are supposedly anti-lockout. Anyone have any guesses?
All I know is all it takes is eight owners to keep the lockout going. I'd guess the big sticking issue is really contract rollback. This wouldn't be an issue that would effect the Sharks as much as other owners in fact since the sharks have been effectively managing their contracts they likely would view contract rollback as unfair. From there just look at what teams have ridiculous long term contracts and you may be able to guess who would be pro lockout.

WantonAbandon is offline