Wild future vs. Oilers future
View Single Post
12-03-2012, 07:47 PM
Join Date: Apr 2012
Originally Posted by
Let's say they take a cut and are payed less than the Minnesota stars (-7M) and all garner 6M contracts, is it better to have two stars at 7.5, or four at 6?
Personally, I think it's important to have the depth players (I'm using this term grudgingly because I feel that these two will be solid 2nd liners) like
Zucker and Coyle because they won't command the extra pay that the stars will and will only produce marginally less, at least that's my opinoin.
I think that Minnesota has a better future because of the balance in their prospects. Do the Oilers have a bright one too? Yes, I believe so, but until they learn to draft outside the top two rounds and manage assets with emphasis toward the middle two lines, they won't go anywhere
So Coyle and Zucker will produce marginally less then the Big Four? To each his own i guess.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by MuzzaFuzza