Thread: Value of: Marc Staal to St. Louis
View Single Post
Old
12-04-2012, 09:58 AM
  #47
bernmeister
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,008
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Inglorious One View Post
Ah I see. Totally forgot about the Nash trade. at me.

Well then yeah I see why Shattenkirk would be the target which makes these teams not a good fit.
not so much at you.

Analysis by Trxjw was solid. However, the premise can still be explored if we view this in a context of risk reward.

It doesn't make sense to move Staal unless
1) we get = or better D from the right side, pref. also able to help out on PP
OR
2) we get enough upgrade in another area (sniper/scoring) that it is too much profit to walk away from.

Not adding a D like Shattenkirk to at least partially offset the loss of a premium shut down D forces Blues to add to their non D compensation.

Perron is serious, but not enough premium for Rangers to be short on D.

What it really would take, IMO, is
Stall and lesser X for Tarascenko
or
Stall and something medium substantial Y for Tarascenko + Perron

where Blues keep their D, and Rangers keep Kreider

recognize OP said not to include Tarascenko, and no consternation intended. Just sayin given all of the above, that would be the fastest way to actually make a move that gets Marc to St. Louis.

bernmeister is offline   Reply With Quote