View Single Post
Old
12-04-2012, 12:21 PM
  #18
TheHudlinator
Registered User
 
TheHudlinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,837
vCash: 354
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLAMESFAN View Post
Kirant, we have what we have. Yes, the # of games are small, but if we go back to last year it has to be concerning the amount of game action he has been able to get into. You want your stud goalie to get alot of games, not a couple a month. AS for the question in you first paragragh, yes that would make him look bad. But hopefully he'd be able to show that was just a blip, and have a good game soon after.

AS far as the contract issues: what's worse, him not playing so he can't get claimed when there is no hockey, or him not playing? I for one do not like how we are managing this asset.
You are completing ignoring the fact that he was hurt after his first call up to the nhl and his numbers suffered, before his call up he had .922 Sv% and 1.95 GAA. So your argument is completely invalid as he was one of the top goalies in the AHL before his callup and his injury but I guess he must suck because he has a 1 bad game in the 4 he has played this year.

TheHudlinator is offline   Reply With Quote