View Single Post
12-04-2012, 02:14 PM
Kane One
Global Moderator
Kane One's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Brooklyn, New NY
Country: United States
Posts: 27,534
vCash: 2705
Originally Posted by Blackhawkswincup View Post
CBA was not viable for another year

To many teams losing $$$ and with projected cap of 70M and a floor rising as well it was the NHL's right via the CBA to end it
Not viable for whom (I think I finally used that word correctly. )?

From the Rangers' point of view, how was the CBA not viable for another year?

According to Forbes, the Rangers had the second-highest operating income. How the hell was the current CBA not viable for them? How about the Leafs?


Last edited by Kane One: 12-04-2012 at 02:20 PM.
Kane One is online now