2012-13 Lockout Discussion Part VIII: "The 11th Hour" Edition
View Single Post
12-04-2012, 02:14 PM
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Brooklyn, New NY
Originally Posted by
CBA was not viable for another year
To many teams losing $$$ and with projected cap of 70M and a floor rising as well it was the NHL's right via the CBA to end it
Not viable for whom (I think I finally used that word correctly.
From the Rangers' point of view, how was the CBA not viable for another year?
According to Forbes, the Rangers had the second-highest operating income. How the hell was the current CBA not viable for them? How about the Leafs?
Last edited by Kane One: 12-04-2012 at
View Public Profile
Kane One's albums
Visit Kane One's homepage!
Find More Posts by Kane One