View Single Post
Old
12-04-2012, 02:14 PM
  #251
Screw You Rick Nash
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
 
Screw You Rick Nash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Brooklyn, New NY
Country: United States
Posts: 27,279
vCash: 3000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackhawkswincup View Post
CBA was not viable for another year

To many teams losing $$$ and with projected cap of 70M and a floor rising as well it was the NHL's right via the CBA to end it
Not viable for whom (I think I finally used that word correctly. )?

From the Rangers' point of view, how was the CBA not viable for another year?

According to Forbes, the Rangers had the second-highest operating income. How the hell was the current CBA not viable for them? How about the Leafs?

__________________
++++++++++[>+++++++>++++++++++>+++>+<<<<
-]>++++++.>+.+++++++++++++++.>+++++++++.<-.
>-------.<<-----.>----.>.<<+++++++++++.>-------------
-.+++++++++++++.-------.--.+++++++++++++.+.>+.>.

New and improved Hockey Standings
"A jimmie for a jimmie makes the whole world rustled." -31-

Last edited by Screw You Rick Nash: 12-04-2012 at 02:20 PM.
Screw You Rick Nash is offline