View Single Post
12-04-2012, 02:38 PM
Registered User
WubbaLubbaDubDub's Avatar
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 8,164
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by EvoLu7ioN View Post
Why would it matter if it was part of the first deal though? The purpose of the max players in deal rule was to prevent GMs from blowing up or changing their teams too much. So if a GM wants to waste their two deals on a small extension to the first deal tbh I don't see a reason why that shouldn't be allowed as it doesn't go against the nature/reason for the max players rule.

Fair value rules should definitely still apply tho, and I think in a back to back scenario like this the trade should be evaluated as a whole rather than two desperate deals.

Just my opinion anyways.
We had this problem yesterday in Sitwell and I couldnt allow it because it just circumvented the trade rules. Which are there for a reason. So both trades must remain equal as they are two seperate trades. So you cant evaluate the two trades as one trade.

WubbaLubbaDubDub is offline   Reply With Quote