View Single Post
12-04-2012, 02:52 PM
x Tame Impala
Registered User
x Tame Impala's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 17,352
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by EvoLu7ioN View Post
Why would it matter if it was part of the first deal though? The purpose of the max players in deal rule was to prevent GMs from blowing up or changing their teams too much. So if a GM wants to waste their two deals on a small extension to the first deal tbh I don't see a reason why that shouldn't be allowed as it doesn't go against the nature/reason for the max players rule.

Fair value rules should definitely still apply tho, and I think in a back to back scenario like this the trade should be evaluated as a whole rather than two desperate deals.

Just my opinion anyways.
Its a way to get around the rules and it isn't fair to other teams. Look at the Sitwell Trade thread for more details

x Tame Impala is offline   Reply With Quote