View Single Post
12-04-2012, 04:09 PM
Registered User
EverettMike's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Everett, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 20,321
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Latrappe View Post
When i look at our situation, i think paying more $$$ for shorter term is the best strategy. Victorino is a versatile player who will help the team. The $$$ might too much for him but Ellsbury will walk at the end of next year and Bradley will not be ready until 2 years. Cody Ross might have been a cheaper option but it doesn't solve the void at centerfield that the team will face at the end of next season.
Victorino has sucked for three years.

You think signing him for three years is short term?

I don't want him for one.

EverettMike is offline