Is length of career a legitimate obstacle when it comes to the the HoF?
View Single Post
12-06-2012, 11:47 AM
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cabbage Patch
Agreed that Thomas is a weird case. Though it seems like just about
goalie in the 2000s is a weird case.
Apart from Brodeur, I don't think there’s a single clear-cut HOF-worthy goalie from the past decade. Luongo is a no unless he overcomes his playoff reputation. Kiprusoff has flaws. Thomas has flaws. Giguere has flaws. Miller has flaws. Osgood has flaws. Maybe Lundqvist is on track, but who knows? He could fall off too.
Is there any other decade in history that has had only one HOF goalie?
And if so, that raises a few questions: Was this just a fluke? Or is Mike Farkas right that we’ve entered a new era where coaches and teams are more important than goalies, which means that we won’t see very many more HOF goalies unless they're either Hasek-level exceptional or happen to find themselves in a particularly beneficial situation, ala Brodeur in New Jersey?
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Dissonance