View Single Post
12-06-2012, 12:20 PM
portnor, pls
-31-'s Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,818
vCash: 50
Originally Posted by nyr2k2 View Post
Well, it's beneficial for the poorer clubs if it's not an option. It's not beneficial for profitable teams that can afford to sign someone for 12 years. Which is why the owners, I'd wager, will cave on the contract length--they're divided.
I will disagree with you there. I'd guess if term limits were put to owners in a silent vote it would be 30-0 for them.

-31- is offline