View Single Post
12-06-2012, 12:20 PM
Thirty One
portnor, pls
Thirty One's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Victoria, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 16,292
vCash: 420
Originally Posted by nyr2k2 View Post
Well, it's beneficial for the poorer clubs if it's not an option. It's not beneficial for profitable teams that can afford to sign someone for 12 years. Which is why the owners, I'd wager, will cave on the contract length--they're divided.
I will disagree with you there. I'd guess if term limits were put to owners in a silent vote it would be 30-0 for them.

Thirty One is offline