View Single Post
12-06-2012, 02:37 PM
Bleed Ranger Blue
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 16,302
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by mschmidt64 View Post
I don't see why the players should have to "get anything." They are getting the benefit of shorter contracts, which helps most of them.

But I agree I think 5 years is a bit too short. There is also something to be said for a team being able to maintain stability with it's stars. That is also good for the product.

I'd go with 7 years like the NFL does.
How do limited contracts benefit the players? Thats an insane thing to say.

Its about security for them.

Ive taken the owners side on a lot of issues, but not this one. They need to deal with the year to year variance issues far more than capping a term on contract lengths. Thats like going to the dentist for a cleaning and coming out with a root canal.

Bleed Ranger Blue is offline