View Single Post
Old
12-06-2012, 04:40 PM
  #59
VeteranNetPresence
Hey, Orpheus!
 
VeteranNetPresence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,446
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canucker View Post
If the previous CBA is irrelevant so is the salary cap and everything else in it. You can't have it both ways.

-"make whole" is giving back (a portion) what they've been trying to take...thats not getting ahead.
-arbitration rights are staying the same. same is not = to getting ahead.
-The players are going from 57% to 50%. 57% is higher than 50% = loss.

If you think the previous CBA has no bearing on this negotiations we are never going to agree and you will remain wrong IMO.
the previous CBA doesn't exist any more, of course it is irrelevant. there is a reason why contracts have built in clauses stating that it is subject to only the current CBA, you wanna know why? because once it is expired it is - you guessed it- IRRELEVANT.

VeteranNetPresence is offline