View Single Post
12-07-2012, 02:21 AM
Fugu's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ϶(°o°)ϵ
Posts: 36,745
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Freudian View Post

I know you are keeping up with events better than this. Bettman took everything off the table because the NHLPA failed to treat a take it or leave it proposal as a take it or leave it proposal but instead kept the goodies and tried to negotiate the rest. You know this. It had zero to do with the player-owner dynamic being there or not.

Well go over to the lockout thread and look at the article from Cotsonika. I don't see anything there that's worth dying on hill over, to be honest. Between the agreement on variance and term limits (8 yrs from the PA proposal)..... the cap circumvention should no longer be a worry. If you can make the NHL's case for them, and why they wish to die on that hill, please do so (but over in the other thread). Thanks.

Fugu is offline   Reply With Quote