View Single Post
12-07-2012, 06:42 AM
Monctonscout's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 33,181
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Et le But View Post
Oh, I agree that it's better to take a chance on Walsh than hold on to Palushaj, who has no future in the NHL, but Walsh isn't a top priority IMO. He's far from a lost cause though.
Why would Palushaj have no future in the NHL? I think if there is a season he will be in the NHL in the bottom 6/13th forward role and have a chance to make a niche for himself, he just turned 23. He's dominated the AHL the last 2 years(this year not so much), he's at a point where he should be getting an extended look.

Monctonscout is offline