Thread: Proposal: Van-Ana
View Single Post
Old
12-07-2012, 09:26 AM
  #44
Gliff
Unsustainable
 
Gliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 4,659
vCash: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by JuniorNelson View Post
Edler refused to sign with Vancouver before the lockout. This is a bolder statement than Luongo has made about wanting out. With Luongo it's all talk so far, Edler has taken action.

Moving Edler makes far more sense than trading Luongo. Canucks have six other defensemen but only have one other NHL goalie and he's a noob.

Edler will sign somewhere. Having him on your team, learning your system might be an advantage, no? I look at Anahiem's defense and I see room for Edler and his game. I think Edler is a fit and possibly Luongo, too, if Hiller is not able to continue or is traded to Toronto. Luongo and Edler will bring balance to Anahiem and I think offer fair value for a top six forward, whomever that may be.
Huh??? Why are we trading Hiller to Toronto and taking on a goalie with a lifeime contract?

Gliff is offline   Reply With Quote