Wild future vs. Oilers future
View Single Post
12-07-2012, 04:15 PM
Join Date: Jun 2012
Originally Posted by
I'll take the Oilers for several reasons:
1. Zach Parise did not look the same after his injury. He looked a bit slower and not as quick with his first step. You also have to take into account that that the West is a lower scoring conference and Parise is not gonna be used to the insane amount of travelling (compared to the East). He'll still be a great player for the next 3-4 years
2. Blah, blah, blah Ryan Suter doesnt have Shea Weber anymore blah blah blah. Whether this is a legitimate gripe remains to be seen, but you cant tell me a pairing of Suter-Scandella/Spurgeon is gonna even come close in terms of effectiveness
3. The Oilers have the MUCH more proven prospects. RNH, Hall and Eberle have all proven they can be stars in the NHL. As good as Granlund, Coyle, Zucker etc. have looked, they havent proven squat yet.
4. I like the core of Hall/RNH/Schultz/Eberle/Yakupov/Gagner/Hemsky over Koivu/Parise/Suter/Granlund/Heatley (lol)/ Coyle for the next 5-7 years
The Wild will be better for the next 3 or so years, but I cant see either contending during that time
1) We will find out about Parises legs. Knee injuries are vicious.
2) You laugh at the Suter thing and fail to realize he might pair with Brodin or Dumba in the future, and Scandella is no slouch. Yeah, it ain't Weber. That was special (of course, I won't listen to you, I'll take those in Nashville who said Suter made Weber better.)
3) The Oilers have much more proven 'prospects'? I want what drugs you have. The Oils have some mildly proven (albeit, very good) NHL PLAYERS, not prospects. Those you listed for MN have not even played yet in the big league.
4)I think you came here to disguise trolling MN for signing Parise as talk about EDM and MIN. Good try.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Nsjohnson