Lockout IV: One likes to believe in the freedom of hockey (Moderated: see post #2)
View Single Post
12-08-2012, 11:18 PM
Join Date: Dec 2011
Originally Posted by
Yes, look at Tampa. The previous owners wanted to trade Lecavalier, who basically had his backs packed and was set to go to Montreal-- until Gary nixed it. (Recall that all deals had to have Bettman's approval since the co-owners weren't on the same page.) Bettman felt that Tampa's franchise value would be hurt, not hindered, by trading Lecavalier.
So Bettman should have allowed a trade of a major asset to go through when the two owners are not on the same page? I'm not so sure about that. That was a ****** situation from start to finish, and I'm overjoyed that they got Vinik in place.
I've been looking for trouble... but trouble hasn't been cooperating!
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Riptide