Lockout IV: One likes to believe in the freedom of hockey (Moderated: see post #2)
View Single Post
12-09-2012, 01:34 AM
Join Date: Dec 2011
Originally Posted by
If the league had committed to a single figure, 5,6,7 or 8.... I can accept that there may be some reasoning to support THAT term.
I cannot find any justification whatsoever why they as a league would want to give home teams some edge, which is a material difference of 40% additional term! It makes a joke of any other reason they would offer as to why 5 yrs [or any number and then plus 40%] is a justifiable length.
Or the fact that the league is attempting to move slightly and give the players some security in a manor that the league believes is still in the leagues best interests.
I've been looking for trouble... but trouble hasn't been cooperating!
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Riptide