View Single Post
12-09-2012, 06:57 AM
Seahawks 43
me2's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Broncos 8
Country: Wallis & Futuna
Posts: 17,326
vCash: 50
Originally Posted by Blackhawkswincup View Post
Bobby Mac said alot of players are fine with 10 yr CBA (bottom 6 F's and bottom 4 dmen feel it would be safety for them going forward to have longterm stablity with no CBA uncertainty)

It was Fehr and top guys who dont want it
2 reasons IMHO

1. I think the militant players probably want the option to go to war again. 10 years is to long wait.

2. Money, money, money. Eg $300m in make whole over a years cba is about $2m more per term per year for the players, and much easier for Fehr to sell as outsmarting the owners, getting them 53-54%. This feeds into point that the money is paid players can push for greater than 50%. The longer the deal, for the owners it's easier rationalise 300m over 10 years, just 1m per team per year. Gives the players 51-52%.

me2 is offline