View Single Post
12-09-2012, 10:23 AM
Riptide's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Yukon
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,418
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by LSnow View Post
In best interest of the "game" would be that Owners get 60% of the revenue and put 20% of it in revenue sharing, and Players get screwed.

That is not best interest of the players.

Which is why i think its ridiculous anyone ever says "Best interest of the game".
Here's another subjective question. If the owners have stable teams, and everyone is making tons of money (owners and players)... are the players getting screwed?

We would not see the NHL locking out it's players every CBA if the owners collectively were pocketing millions (2-3 times what they are now).

"I changed the whole game, man," Rinaldo said. "Who knows what the game would have been like if I didn't do what I did?" [after illegally running Letang from behind, slamming his head into the glass]
Riptide is offline   Reply With Quote