Quote:
Originally Posted by LSnow
In best interest of the "game" would be that Owners get 60% of the revenue and put 20% of it in revenue sharing, and Players get screwed.
That is not best interest of the players.
Which is why i think its ridiculous anyone ever says "Best interest of the game".
|
Here's another subjective question. If the owners have stable teams, and everyone is making tons of money (owners and players)... are the players getting screwed?
We would not see the NHL locking out it's players every CBA if the owners collectively were pocketing millions (2-3 times what they are now).