Does the NHL commissioner need to be free from owners' control?
View Single Post
12-09-2012, 10:23 AM
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Northern Canada
Originally Posted by
In best interest of the "game" would be that Owners get 60% of the revenue and put 20% of it in revenue sharing, and Players get screwed.
That is not best interest of the players.
Which is why i think its ridiculous anyone ever says "Best interest of the game".
Here's another subjective question. If the owners have stable teams, and everyone is making tons of money (owners and players)... are the players getting screwed?
We would not see the NHL locking out it's players every CBA if the owners collectively were pocketing millions (2-3 times what they are now).
"Itís not as if Donald Fehr was lying to us, several players said. Rather, itís as if he has been economical with information, these players believe, not sharing facts these players consider to be vital."
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Riptide