Thread: Proposal: Flames - Maple Leafs
View Single Post
Old
12-09-2012, 10:55 AM
  #72
Noori
Registered User
 
Noori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,698
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGleninator View Post
No it's not the fact its debatable proves it, Backlund also was able to stick around on the 4th line but I believe Feaster was referring to a conditioning stint more than anything. You also forgot to add that Horak was sent the AHL but was called up again when injuries (backlund and others) pilled up and he was needed. Over the last 2 months of the season with many injuries Horak played an average of less than 9 minutes a night so even in the most desperate of times he played barely played.

Your theory of Horak is better because he played the majority of the year is invalid as he was needed to stay up due to injure and didn't see much ice time he would have been in the ahl.
It had nothing to do with a conditioning stint since Feaster said that the flames were planning to send him down PRIOR tot he injury. Feasted indicated he wasn't happy with Backlund's play.

Horak would often play while a guy like Stajan would sit. He was constantly praised for his attention to detail in the defensive zone by Sutter. It's all Horak would ever talk about, about wanting to play the game right defensively and not worrying so much about the offense. And it showed in his play.

Noori is offline   Reply With Quote