Thread: Speculation: More Luongo Talk
View Single Post
Old
12-11-2012, 03:38 PM
  #866
y2kcanucks
Cult of Personality
 
y2kcanucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Surrey, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 47,310
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to y2kcanucks
Quote:
Originally Posted by MakeTheIronSing View Post
I tried to ask this last night and all I got was that there is a greater weakness in the top six on the right wing and this is why the Canucks didn't win a stanley cup. I've been trying to find out why a team wouldnt want two great goaltenders the whole time.

To no avail.
What the hell are you talking about? You asked why the Canucks would move Luongo if he's so great. I gave you an answer, saying that we would like to address holes in our lineup, mainly the hole in our top 6 forwards. You for some reason assumed that meant we were looking for a stop-gap solution (no idea why you would come to that conclusion, but anyways).

Why is it so hard to accept that the Canucks have two great goalies, and it would be ideal to move one of them in exchange for a permanent solution to a hole in our lineup? All the while, if that solution isn't being offered to us, we would be very happy to retain his services until that deal comes up.

What aren't you understanding?

__________________
http://www.vancitynitetours.com
y2kcanucks is offline