Lockout Thread #3: The Rollercoaster Continues...
View Single Post
12-11-2012, 03:01 PM
Join Date: Aug 2002
Originally Posted by
So, it's a "joke" for the owners to make an offer where the players take home 43% of revenue while paying no expenses.
But it's ok for the owners to take home 43%, take all the risks associated with the business, and pay all the player's expenses?
Why would the players pay expenses?
They are not partners they are employees and also the product. I don't understand why this argument is ever made, the players are the expenses.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by HotToddy