Chicago Wolves Discussion - Part VI
View Single Post
12-11-2012, 09:51 PM
Join Date: Sep 2009
Originally Posted by
Haven't your arguments on both Tanev and Schroeder been based on the fact that they're not putting up solid enough numbers in the AHL to be a solid NHL top 4 D, or an NHL centre, respectively.
Ill say what i said to Tiranis, to you also:
Do you think bringing up whether a person is capable or incapable of hitting a point per game is stat scouting? Do you know what stat scouting is?
It doesn't take a stat scout to know whether a player isn't hitting even close to a point per game or not.
When there is an argument and one side brings up stats much more than the other, to call the opposite side a stat scout is extremely silly. Him claiming i am bringing up no stats/evidence and basing it on my opinion of his play shows the opposite of what you are claiming I am
You can't call me black and then try to call me white within the same thread.
Maybe you need to go back in the pages and see who actually brings up the stats that are mentioned, the fact that i argue back regarding a couple stats that are brought up does not mean i am bringing them up, check where the original information came from.
I never even brought up the comparison of hodgson and schroeder nor did i start comparing their stats.
I said an undersized perimeter center with no grit to his game typically needs to outproduce his colleagues and for the style of player he is, his totals are low. then on come the stats about hodgson saying hodgson did well and their stats were the same (for only 50 games might i add). thats EXACTLY what happened.
So if someone were to analyze all the posts, there is 0 chance they would come out with me being the stat scout. Unless you were being completely biased.
Im saying you can't compare stats. You guys keep bringing them up. I mentioned time and time again that i believe that if hodgson were to continue in the ahl, he wouldn't be continuing to get a similar ppg pace as he did in his first year. I think hodgson's pedigree and vision and skill would have made him a ppg player. My assumptions based on watching them play night in and night out give me this opinion. Which i believe is a similar opinion to the moose gm, scouts, canucks management, etc - considering hodgson made it into the nhl and onto a 2nd line and schroeder is fighting for a chance to get a call up.
Last edited by pseudonymous01: 12-11-2012 at
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by pseudonymous01