Thread: Proposal: Bruins - Oilers
View Single Post
Old
12-12-2012, 09:27 AM
  #41
McCupofOil
Bob The Builder
 
McCupofOil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: 5-14-6-1
Country: United States
Posts: 15,624
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eennad142 View Post
Rask is a good goalie, but not Carey Price-style franchise level. Rask was a W/L .500% backup goalie for the past two years, and played against the weak teams on the schedule. Rask was given one-year deal in order to prove himself, not a good sign. Subban has as much potential as anyone in this pipedream deal, and will be the starter in Boston sooner rather than later.
I'm confused. I thought that Bruins fans were looking at Rask as a Price level talent potentially.
I don't think that him only getting a 1 year deal is a sign that Bruins management isn't high on him. It's just a prove it type of deal, he wasn't going to get a long term deal without having played a full season as the #1.
Also, i highly doubt that Subban has as much potential as Yakupov or Hamilton. He's not even the best goalie prospect in this draft, that would be Vasilevski.

McCupofOil is offline   Reply With Quote