Thread: Proposal: Bruins - Oilers
View Single Post
Old
12-12-2012, 09:39 AM
  #42
Eennad142
Registered User
 
Eennad142's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 2,221
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CupofOil View Post
I'm confused. I thought that Bruins fans were looking at Rask as a Price level talent potentially.
I don't think that him only getting a 1 year deal is a sign that Bruins management isn't high on him. It's just a prove it type of deal, he wasn't going to get a long term deal without having played a full season as the #1.
Also, i highly doubt that Subban has as much potential as Yakupov or Hamilton. He's not even the best goalie prospect in this draft, that would be Vasilevski.
Depends which Bruins' posters speak/type. Right now, Rask is a W/L .500% backup goalie. The W/L record was compiled against weakest teams on schedule. Rask received a one-year deal because he is not proven Carey Price-level. Sometimes it's just as simple as that. I consider Subban on equal level to Vasilevski, and so did Boston management at draft.

Eennad142 is offline   Reply With Quote