: Value of:
View Single Post
12-12-2012, 04:35 PM
Join Date: Mar 2012
Originally Posted by
In 2011 Kesler got 1.26 G/60, Little never came anywhere near that. If you want you can make an argument that Little is close to 2012 Kesler, who was playing through a torn labrum and had a revolving door of linemates. But no way in heck is he close to the 2011 Kesler.
1) similar =/= same... I never said they were same, just similar
2) injury doesn't mean increase of value, means decrease
Yes Kesler got 1.26 g/60... but Little's 0.85 g/60 is still better than any other year of Kesler's career...
I don't use Little's 1.12 g/60 year for evaluating the true Little?
hey I'm not against Kesler... I don't think Little = Kesler... but they did perform similarly (Selke nominations aside)... sorry... yes, for Kesler it may be due to injury, but you don't know if he will ever come back 100% which was my whole point... when dealing with trades we are discussing value
And Little had injuries too. The problem with using injuries as an excuse is everyone has them.
I'd like to also add that saying your second C is only slightly better than our 1C isn't really much of an insult.
Last edited by garret9: 12-12-2012 at
View Public Profile
Visit garret9's homepage!
Find More Posts by garret9