Where would you say each major national team is in cyclical terms.
View Single Post
12-12-2012, 09:54 PM
Join Date: Apr 2012
Originally Posted by
The US has produced loads of elite technical players, such as Modano, Roenick, Weight, LaFontaine, Tkachuk, Chelios, Housley, Leetch, Richter, etc. but every country cycles up and down in this regard and the US is no different.
I agree that people way over estimate the amount of talent on paper you need to win a best on best tournament. One thing that makes them so exciting is that by being so short there is a high degree of randomness in who wins. Over time the countries with better teams on paper will win more often but lesser teams always have a good shot too. I would also say that most hockey fans read way, way too much into single game or single tournament victories.
I think we have different definitions of elite technical players if you are including Chelios and a goalie.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Xokkeu