View Single Post
12-13-2012, 11:44 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,237
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by EddieAVS View Post
The bolded is just being naive.

In a system which is in essence, a competition, GM's, Owners and teams will do what they can to find any type of competitive advantage, ESPECIALLY if that advantage, can lead to more money.

All it takes is 1 guy to sign a 6 year deal, before agents and gms keep going round til they either get a 6 or 7 year deal.
If you eliminate backdiving, what in principle is the problem with 7 year deals. If a GM signs Scott Gomez to an exorbitant 7 year deal then they suffer competitively which is the way most businesses work. The well run ones do better than the poorly run ones. With a hard cap of 50% of revenues the players' share is alwasy fixed. It doesn't seem unfair that teams with a good GM should have an advantage over teams with a poor GM.

vanwest is offline