Rochester Americans / Minors Thread '12-'13 Ed.
View Single Post
12-13-2012, 01:52 PM
Join Date: Nov 2012
Originally Posted by
Depends on the team. He's better suited on the 3rd line than Legault. It's debatable with Sunder, but Girgensons has played a lot more.
It's not going to happen. But hypothetically, Girgensons would be out of the top 9 if a vet forward was brought in.
Yes and no. He's quicker and looks to have more skill right now. But he hasn't played much and he's been invisible at times.
No, Flynn would still be playing and someone like Legault would be out of the lineup. But this is a stupid hypothetical anyway.
I don't see them taking him out of the top 9 in any situation... they started him there with everyone healthy- this is kind of my point on why they won't bring in a veteran forward, they would be forced to either sit one of their top guys or drop Girgensons to 4th line.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by AmerksPuck