View Single Post
Old
12-14-2012, 12:10 AM
  #75
DAChampion
Registered User
 
DAChampion's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Country: Australia
Posts: 6,311
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bullsmith View Post
Why 3 years?

Personally I prefer one year. I feel teams that finished out of the playoffs 3 years in a row already have 3 shots at exciting prospects better orgs didn't have. But if you're going to go back and even things out, why not go back to the last lockout? Or 10 years? Or 5? Why is 3 the magic number?

Someone came up with it. There should be a rationale, however slim. Or, more likely, this is the NHL and they just pulled 3 years out of their butts.
We'rd 3rd overall if it's based on 2011-2012 standings.

However, over the past 3 seasons we've had 78, 96, and 88 points, for an average of 87.33 points, we would draft approximately 11th overall.

Quote:
Originally Posted by overlords View Post
i would love them to use the 2011-2012 standings but....

Would really piss me off to see edmonton get another top 3 pick. Would be disgusting.
Edmonton has been that bad.

DAChampion is offline   Reply With Quote